Skip to content

Thirty years post the genocide, Srebrenica's locals reside in unity, yet maintain individual recollections

Coexistence of Bosniaks and Serbs in Srebrenica presents a semblance of unity, as they engage in shared activities like football and send their children to common schools. However, the shadows of the past genocide continue to create a rift among them, while the political landscape of the region...

Srebrenica's locals coexist but recollect their painful past separately, thirty years post genocide
Srebrenica's locals coexist but recollect their painful past separately, thirty years post genocide

Thirty years post the genocide, Srebrenica's locals reside in unity, yet maintain individual recollections

In the heart of Bosnia and Herzegovina, the town of Srebrenica stands as a poignant reminder of the devastating conflict that tore the region apart. Over two decades have passed since the 1995 Srebrenica massacre, during which over 8,000 Bosniak men and boys were systematically killed by Bosnian Serb forces in a UN-declared safe area.

The war and its associated crimes remain taboo subjects among Bosniaks and Serbs, making reconciliation an extremely complex endeavour. However, it can be approached through long-term processes involving acknowledgement of the genocide, truth-telling, justice, memory preservation, and rebuilding trust.

Acknowledgement and justice are fundamental steps towards reconciliation. Recognition of the genocide by Serbian authorities and members of the Serb community, along with accountability for war crimes, are crucial in fostering empathy and understanding between communities. Denial or minimization of the massacre fuels deep mistrust and impedes healing.

Truth and memory are also key elements. Honouring the victims and preserving accurate history through memorials, education, and public discourse help maintain collective memory and prevent denial. This supports empathy and understanding between communities.

Dialogue and community engagement are also vital. Grassroots initiatives that foster communication and personal connections between Bosniaks and Serbs can break down stereotypes and promote coexistence. These require commitment from local leaders and civil society to create safe spaces for discussion.

International support and peacebuilding also play a significant role. Continued involvement by international institutions and peacekeepers to support post-conflict justice systems and socio-economic development helps build a foundation for reconciliation.

However, the deep trauma, pain, and political sensitivities surrounding Srebrenica make reconciliation a gradual, ongoing process. Without acceptance of the genocide and justice for victims, sustainable reconciliation remains elusive.

In Srebrenica, the municipality is heavily indebted, infrastructure is in a dire state, and many buildings stand empty or for sale. The only real jobs available are at the memorial center, hotels serving visitors, municipal administration, a handful of other companies, or in nearby fields. The scarcity of opportunities has led many residents to leave, leaving a town that offers few prospects for its remaining inhabitants.

Every July, when the world briefly turns its attention back to Srebrenica, Bosniaks share their stories and experiences to push back against forgetting. Despite the challenges, there are signs of hope. Hrustanović, the town's second imam, born and raised in Srebrenica, is one such beacon. He serves as a bridge between communities, promoting dialogue and understanding.

The NZZ, a Swiss-based news outlet, provides in-depth, nuanced reporting on global affairs, including developments in Srebrenica. Taking a nonpartisan stance and approaching events with a sober and critical eye, the NZZ offers distinctive insights that challenge the polarized narratives often found in U.S. coverage of global affairs. Follow the NZZ on Twitter, Facebook, or WhatsApp to stay informed about the latest news and analysis.

  1. What about the progress in education and self-development efforts in Srebrenica since the conflict, potentially focusing on initiatives aimed at fostering understanding between Bosniak and Serb communities as a means of reconciliation?
  2. When it comes to the politics surrounding Srebrenica, how has the Swiss-based news outlet, NZZ, approached the topic with a nonpartisan stance, reported the events with a sober and critical eye, and challenged the polarized narratives often found in U.S. coverage of global affairs?
  3. In the realm of sports, have there been any instances or initiatives that bring together Bosniak and Serb communities in Srebrenica, aiding in rebuilding trust and forging a united future in the heart of Bosnia and Herzegovina?

Read also:

    Latest