Skip to content
This is a paper. On this something is written.
This is a paper. On this something is written.

Supreme Court to Decide on Conversion Therapy Bans for Minors

The Supreme Court is set to decide on the constitutionality of bans on conversion therapy for children in nearly half of U.S. states. The case, brought by Christian counselor Kaley Chiles, challenges Colorado's law that prohibits attempts to change a minor's sexual orientation or gender identity. The court will hear arguments on Tuesday.

Colorado defends its law, asserting that conversion therapy is harmful and ineffective. The state argues that the ban only targets specific practices, not broader discussions about gender and sexuality. The law exempts religious ministries and allows therapists to discuss these topics with young patients.

The Supreme Court has previously ruled that regulations incidentally burdening speech are permissible. Colorado argues its law falls under this category. The court agreed to hear the case after federal appeals courts reached differing decisions on similar bans in Colorado and Florida.

Chiles, represented by the Alliance Defending Freedom, contends that her approach is different from past conversion therapies and argues discrimination. She claims Colorado allows affirming counseling but bans her method. The Trump administration supports Chiles' argument, suggesting the law may violate the First Amendment.

Linda Robertson, a Christian mother, shares her son's tragic experience with conversion therapy, which she believes led to his depression and eventual suicide. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) represents Chiles in the lawsuit.

The Supreme Court's decision will impact nearly half of U.S. states with similar bans. Colorado maintains its law protects minors from harmful practices, while Chiles argues for her right to provide her services. The court's ruling will clarify the balance between protecting free speech and safeguarding vulnerable youth.

Read also:

Latest