Skip to content

Revised Class Schedule at Hellgate Sparks Mixed Reactions Among Students

Revised class periods lasting 34 minutes each, elimination of block periods, and classes ending at less desirable times have stirred various student opinions regarding the new schedule. The question remains, what aspects of this new schedule are students finding advantageous or burdensome?...

Revised Schedule for Hellgate Classes Sparks Diverse Student Responses
Revised Schedule for Hellgate Classes Sparks Diverse Student Responses

Revised Class Schedule at Hellgate Sparks Mixed Reactions Among Students

The newly implemented school schedule, designed to provide more flexibility and variety, has brought about a mix of reactions from students and teachers. Anna Bacon, a dedicated teacher, finds the start and stop times beneficial due to after-school activities, but expresses concern about students who take the city bus, as they may need to find alternative arrangements due to the earlier dismissal times.

The schedule, which features shorter class periods and the removal of block periods, offers several advantages. Teachers may experience less burnout due to more varied work periods, and students and teachers can have multiple subjects within a single day, providing variety and reducing long periods of sitting in one subject. Additionally, changing schedules and school calendars can boost overall staff morale.

However, there are also disadvantages to consider. The shorter class duration may limit the depth of instruction, impacting instructional quality and student understanding. Inconvenient class start and end times can disrupt routines, making transportation, childcare for students, and work-life balance for teachers more complicated. Furthermore, the lack of block periods reduces flexibility for in-depth lessons, particularly in subjects like sciences or arts.

Both students and teachers may face challenges adjusting to the new timings, which can cause stress and reduce overall satisfaction with the school experience in the short term. For instance, Story Land, a junior, finds the Thursday class periods of 34 minutes inconvenient, and the schedule before lunch on Thursdays particularly long. Hadley Henderson, a sophomore, prefers starting earlier in the day as it makes her feel more productive, but finds the Thursday early out schedule with office hours too rushed.

While some research shows no significant negative academic effects of changed schedules when total instructional time is maintained, lack of block periods and inconvenient timing have been reported as common concerns among participants in such changes. The precise impacts depend on how the schedule manages total instructional time and supports adjustment for students and staff.

Anna Bacon's opinion on the schedule before lunch on Thursdays and the benefits of the new schedule system for teachers are not yet clear. The overall thought of the new schedule system is generally good, but its specific effects on students and teachers are still being evaluated. Ben Bryant, a junior, does not find the schedule times inconvenient and prefers early dismissal over late starts.

In summary, the main trade-off is between flexibility and variety (advantages of shorter periods and the removal of block scheduling) versus instructional depth and routine stability (disadvantages related to less time per class and inconvenient timing). The precise impacts depend on how the schedule manages total instructional time and supports adjustment for students and staff.

The new schedule, with its shorter class periods and removal of block scheduling, offers potential benefits in education-and-self-development through reduced teacher burnout, increased variety for students, and potential boosts in staff morale. However, it also presents challenges, as the shorter class duration may limit the depth of instruction and disrupt routines for both students and teachers, impacting their work-life balance and overall satisfaction.

Read also:

    Latest