Skip to content
Communication — Negotiation — Diplomacy — Law — Business — Research — Dispute resolution — Learning

Courtroom Design with Multiple Entrances for Diverse Legal Cases

Negotiation program faculty member Frank Sander explores the groundbreaking idea of the multi-door courthouse and its advantages for legal professionals.

,   and  Administrator
3 min read
Discussion with Negotiation faculty member Frank Sander delves into the groundbreaking idea of the...
Discussion with Negotiation faculty member Frank Sander delves into the groundbreaking idea of the multi-door courthouse, highlighting its advantages for lawyers engaged in litigation.

Unleashing the Power of Multiple Dispute Resolution Channels: The Multi-Door Courthouse

originated from the innovative minds at Harvard Law School, championed by Professor Frank E.A. Sander, and UST School of Law, led by Professor Mariana Hernandez Crespo. This dynamic duo sought to revolutionize the dispute resolution landscape with their groundbreaking work on the multi-door courthouse.

Score a free copy of International Negotiations: Mastering Cross-Cultural Communication Skills from Harvard Law School's Program on Negotiation

Dive into the intricacies of international negotiations with this valuable resource available for free!

The Multi-Door Courthouse: A New Breed of Dispute Resolution

The UST International ADR Research Network, under Hernandez Crespo's guidance, has designed a research program that focuses on crafting inclusive problem-solving models. These models utilize consensus-building techniques, ensuring that all stakeholders, particularly those often overlooked, have a voice in the process.

During a pioneering project in Brazil, participants delved into the diverse options to optimize dispute resolution, including the multi-door courthouse proposal by Sander. To explore this further, the team adopted a virtual forum following the consensus-building methodology devised by Lawrence Susskind of MIT and Harvard Law School.

Share your thoughts on the multi-door courthouse

First published in 2010.

Download the full article here

Take control of international disputes with International Negotiations: Mastering Cross-Cultural Communication Skills

Spotlight on Dispute Resolution: Navigating Cultural Barriers

Cultural differences should never hinder negotiators; they can be transcended to foster mutual understanding and agreement. To help you along this journey, here are some negotiation tips to overcome communication barriers.

In the Arena of International Negotiations: Tony Blair's 10 Principles

Find inspiration in the diplomatic brilliance of former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, who navigated international conflicts masterfully using a combination of diplomatic and business strategies. Adopt these tactics to excel in your own international negotiations.

Related Insights:

Top International Negotiation Examples: Apple's Apology in ChinaFamous Negotiators: Angela Merkel and Vladimir PutinManaging Cultural Differences in NegotiationCross-Cultural Communication in Business NegotiationsGovernment Negotiations: The Brittney Griner Case

Discover the secret behind the Multi-Door Courthouse

A multi-door courthouse is an innovative solution to streamline dispute resolution by creating multiple channels or "doors" to address disputes. This approach seeks to relieve pressure on traditional courts by fostering mediation, arbitration, and other alternative dispute resolution methods.

The operation of a multi-door courthouse generally involves an initial assessment of the suitability of a case for alternative dispute resolution, followed by referral to appropriate ADR institutions or practitioners. The parties may choose to participate in ADR voluntarily or as a result of a court referral. This flexible approach encourages parties to pursue less adversarial and cost-effective methods of dispute resolution, ultimately leading to more satisfying results for all involved.

The Lagos Multi-Door Courthouse in Nigeria is a prime example of this concept in action, offering a framework for resolving disputes through various alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, thereby improving efficiency and lowering the workload of traditional courts. This approach aligns with broader trends in the field that focus on flexible and efficient dispute resolution processes in contemporary legal systems.

  1. The UST International ADR Research Network, under the guidance of Professor Mariana Hernandez Crespo, has focused its research on crafting inclusive problem-solving models for dispute resolution that utilize consensus-building techniques to ensure all stakeholders have a voice.
  2. To explore the multi-door courthouse further, a pioneering project in Brazil adopted a virtual forum following the consensus-building methodology devised by Lawrence Susskind, of MIT and Harvard Law School.
  3. Share your thoughts on the multi-door courthouse, a free e-book on international negotiations can be obtained from Harvard Law School's Program on Negotiation.
  4. To excel in international negotiations, consider the diplomatic brilliance of former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, who masterfully navigated conflicts using a combination of diplomatic and business strategies, as outlined in the book International Negotiations: Mastering Cross-Cultural Communication Skills.
  5. To improve efficiency and lower the workload of traditional courts, consider the Lagos Multi-Door Courthouse in Nigeria, a prime example of the innovative multi-door courthouse concept, which offers a framework for resolving disputes through various alternative dispute resolution mechanisms.

Read also:

    Related

    Latest